Four things we do that most competitors don't.

Most accessibility companies sell a monthly subscription to every client, whether the site needs ongoing monitoring or not. A dental brochure site that gets updated twice a year doesn't need monthly monitoring. It needs a one-time fix and a yearly check-in.

That's why we built Verified: $997 to $3,997 to fix the code once, then $197 to $297 a year. For sites with active publishing, e-commerce, or exposure that justifies monthly review, we have Active at $147 to $197 per month.

We set pricing to match the work, so a site that rarely changes never pays for monthly monitoring.

No hourly rates. No scope creep. Audit $97. Fix $997 to $3,997. Rebuild $4,500 to $12,000. Monitoring $147 to $197 a month.

How we keep prices down: repeatable fixes for the problems small business websites share, and automated scanning that does the discovery work up front.

Our audit is structured so a developer can execute from it without further consultation. Every finding includes the WCAG success criterion, the specific rule, an example of the failing code, a remediation pattern, and a prioritization signal tied to litigation exposure.

If you want to hire your own developer after reading it, you can. We built it that way on purpose. The audit lists every fix, worst problems first, so you can hand it to any developer and compare quotes.

The honest position: there are limited, specific cases where an overlay widget is a reasonable temporary stopgap. A short-lived campaign site with a known expiry date. A platform you're actively deprecating. These are edge cases.

Almost everywhere else, a widget is money spent on the wrong thing. It doesn't fix the underlying code. More than 1 in 4 website accessibility lawsuits in 2025 named a business that already had one installed (UsableNet), and the FTC ordered accessiBe, one of the best-known widget companies, to pay $1 million for claiming its product could make any website compliant.